Joo Haknyeon Cleared of Prostitution Allegations, Files Lawsuit Against Reporter
On July 2, the Gangnam Police Department announced it had decided not to pursue charges against THE BOYZ former member Joo Haknyeon regarding allegations that he paid for sex with AV actress Asuka Kirara. According to police, the accusations were largely based on online articles and lacked sufficient evidence to warrant an investigation.
Joo Haknyeon finds himself in the center of controversy following his alleged involvement with Japanese AV actress Asuka Kirara and the ensuing fallout with his agency, One Hundred. Despite his emotional appeal to the public and denial of any wrongdoing, public sentiment remains largely unsympathetic.
The scandal erupted after Joo Haknyeon declared a halt in activities, which was later revealed to be connected to his association with Asuka Kirara, a figure known for appearances in 446 adult films. The revelation shocked fans and the public, causing a swift and harsh backlash.
One Hundred announced Joo Haknyeon’s departure and contract termination on June 18, citing a breach of contract under Clause 6.3 damage to the image and dignity required of a public figure. However, Joo Haknyeon claims he neither agreed to leave the group nor accepted the contract termination. In a statement on June 20, he challenged the agency, asking for evidence of any illegal behavior and accusing them of manipulating the situation to force his exit.
Joo Haknyeon also disclosed that he was pressured to sign a termination settlement that demanded over 2 billion won in compensation. He insists the figures include a prorated refund of his 1.5 billion won signing bonus, with 1.23 billion won remaining for the unfulfilled term. The remaining 770 million won was calculated based on projected earnings from THE BOYZ’s active contracts.
Despite Joo Haknyeon’s claim of being a victim of “character assassination,” public reaction has been cold. Many view the AV-related scandal as damaging enough to warrant his departure, regardless of the legal nuances.
Even his appeal on Instagram, where he described his fear of being unfairly labeled a sex offender and his emotional distress, failed to reverse the tide. Critics highlight that while he emphasizes personal suffering, he sidesteps responsibility for the scandal’s broader impact on the group and fans.
As Sports Chosun noted, the financial terms Joo Haknyeon objects to are standard in the K-pop industry where early termination typically requires refunding any unearned portions of signing bonuses, unless otherwise stipulated.
In the face of intensifying public scrutiny, Joo Haknyeon‘s case underscores the fragile line between the right to defend one’s personal dignity and the responsibility that comes with being a public figure.