Shin Jung-hwan Alleges Female Celebrity Was Involved in High-Profile Sex Bribery Scandal: “Met Three Men at Once, Specific Amounts Discussed”
Former TV personality Shin Jung-hwan has ignited a firestorm online after making a bold claim about a female celebrity allegedly involved in a sex bribery scandal.
Shin Jung-hwan Drops Bombshell on Celebrity Sex Bribery Allegations
The revelation came during the April 21 episode of the YouTube talk show NonNonNon, which featured a provocative roundtable titled “The Wildest Roundtable Yet! (feat. Power, Celebrities, and Sex Bribery).”
While discussing the murky world of celebrity sponsorships and alleged sexual favors, Shin recounted a disturbing encounter. He claimed to have overheard a group of older acquaintances openly discussing their involvement with the same female celebrity, each mentioning exact amounts of money, such as 5 million KRW and 10 million KRW, allegedly paid for her company.
“At first, I thought I misheard,” Shin said. “But then I realized they were all talking about the same woman. Three different men, one name, it shocked me.”
When pressed by co-host Kang Byung-gyu for the woman’s identity, Shin refused to divulge any details. “I can’t even tell the production team. It’s hard to talk about because she was having meals, drinks, and playing golf with these businessmen who were clearly paying her,” he said.
No Names, Just Rumors: Viral Clip Sparks Concern and Speculation
The show’s staff asked if the woman was ever caught or publicly named. Shin replied that while there were existing rumors, no official exposure had occurred. Kang added that similar tabloid-style lists with names and alleged “prices” have surfaced in the past, further fueling the public’s curiosity.
Jang Hye-ri, another panelist, expressed disbelief that the woman would meet multiple men from the same circle. Shin responded, “She probably has a general idea but assumes they won’t talk about it.”
The segment has since gone viral, triggering rampant speculation across online communities. Though no names were mentioned, the nature of the claims has stirred concern over privacy, reputational damage, and the blurred lines between rumor and public interest.
